"I'm I the only one who feels like this is driven to much by rational engineering but fundamentally without understanding what people actually want and need? In a way this is a clever lighting solution with different functionalities embedded, but I'd never want this is in my home. A lamp as an object is so much more than a lighting source, and the buying decisions involved are much different than f.ex a vacuum cleaner. It also feels ridiculously over-engineered for the job it has do; Dyson should take a lesson on how to do more with less."
"I don't know, I've seen many student and concept projects like this and it seems like a good idea, but in my opinion this is product that shouldn't be necessary. I'm pretty sure the thinking from PM B&D side is that this will make the total addressable market for power tools larger, by people buying a double set of power tools. These, rather pristine products in white, for light tasks inside, and another set for more serious and dirty work. In reality this is completely unnecessary, driven only by sales and not by real needs. I think this is actually rather silly."
"It's a nice table, but my concerns are about the economics. This doesn't look to be sand casted, which has a low investment and tool cost, but casted, which comes with a much higher investment cost."
"Is there another reason than engineering limitations, that you sit so high when it's equipped with snow tracks? Can't imagine a high cog is ideal when riding in snow?"