" I agree that the relative low use a stroller gets is a big problem, but the subscription service  is obnoxious to me.  Personally I hate all the subscriptions. Great revenue stream for the company but continuous payments and the worry of exceeding wear and tear are anxiety producing.My idea to solve this problem  was to  make a kit of parts that can be  reconfigured, with added or subtracted components so the stroller's parts can be used to make  more products  for the growing human or other family members. I imagine starting with the stroller, evolving to a wagon ( wagons, by the way, can do a lot and should never be underestimated) or a bike trailer, a rickshaw like contraption  then  to a grnddma cart,  a hand truck and even more. My concept definitely adds more material in the world but  parts can be recyclable and  making more products keeps designers designing and the supply chain employed.  Also  less barf covered stroller parts that will need to be replaced anyway."

"I'm sure I get the complaint of too many  variants of the BMW face, but I don't think going back in time is correct either. You sound like someone that only loves the songs you heard in high school.Design is all about change and evolution is generally  good.  Of course, form following function is still important.   Design is contextual and follows and reveals technology. I think we have to let it happen.The BMW i4 concept  shown in the article is, to me,  one of the better evolutions. An electric car does not need the grill. The latest i4 concept that just premiered with its big un-needed black grill is  ridiculous and fails to tell viewers it motivated electrically or at least different from the ICE cars.That said, I do appreciate  your photoshopping skills and I appreciate complaining of all sorts."