"So, I don't quite understand - you now have evidence that a) the "weights" are really hinge parts thatmare metal for durability reasons, and b) these are counterfeit headphones anyway. Yet the article headline continues to state that they're Beats headphones, and that they contain misleading weights. Nothing here indicates that the entire article is wrong unless you dig into the comments. Yes, you've posted your follow up "Uh-Oh" article, but where's the link to that at the top of this one? Numerous sites on the net are linking to this article and its sensationalist headline, and you're doing a disservice to those readers and the Beats company (I've no relation with them, for what's it's worth).At a minimum, the headline should contain something like "[update: all wrong]", and there should be a block ahead of the article text summarizing what's wrong with the article and linking to the followup."